Volume 12, Issue 2 (Summer 2025)                   DSME 2025, 12(2): 193-204 | Back to browse issues page

Research code: 12363
Ethics code: (IR.IUMS.FMD.REC.1399.217)


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghassabichorsi M, Sohrabi Z, Soltani Arabshahi S K, Sedigh Maroufi S, Alizadeh S. Acceptability and feasibility of an group objective structured clinical examination from the perspective of faculty members and anesthesiology students at Iran University of Medical Sciences.. DSME 2025; 12 (2) :193-204
URL: http://dsme.hums.ac.ir/article-1-530-en.html
Ph.D. of Medical Education, Center for Educational Studies and Development, Esfarayen Faculty of Medical Sciences, Esfarayen, Iran. & soltarab34@gmail.com
Abstract:   (445 Views)

Introduction: Clinical skills assessment is a key pillar of medical education that has a significant impact on the quality of graduates' performance. Traditional assessment methods, such as oral and unstructured exams, cannot comprehensively assess clinical competencies owing to problems such as insufficient reliability and validity. The Group Structured Objective Examination (GOSCE), a new assessment method, can be used to assess complex skills such as teamwork and professional communication. This study investigated the acceptability and feasibility of the Group Structured Objective Examination in the field of Anesthesiology at the Iran University of Medical Sciences.

Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, in 2021. The statistical population comprised students and faculty members of the Department of Anesthesiology. Participants included nine faculty members with at least three years of teaching experience and 18 final-semester students, selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using standard questionnaires measuring satisfaction ( Cronbach's alpha = 0.85) and performance ( Cronbach's alpha = 0.72).

Results: The average acceptability of the Group Structured Objective Examination (GOSCE) from the perspective of professors was 98.66±7.21 and from that of students was 98.21±5.10, both of which were above the acceptable level (60). The overall implementability score of the test was 113.22 ± 6.30, indicating the high implementability of the Group Structured Objective Examination (GOSCE). The analyses showed no significant difference between the perspectives of professors and students in terms of the acceptability of the test(P=0.37).

Conclusion: The Group Structured Objective Examination (GOSCE) has high acceptability and feasibility and can be used as a complementary method for assessing clinical skills, especially in the field of anesthesia. Further studies are recommended to investigate the long-term effects of the (GOSCE) method.

Full-Text [PDF 705 kb]   (132 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Orginal | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/08/19 | Accepted: 2025/08/25 | Published: 2025/09/21

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.