Volume 4, Issue 2 (autumn-winter 2017)                   راهبردهای توسعه در آموزش پزشکی 2017, 4(2): 60-70 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Javadi R, Ghanbarnejad A. Comparative Assessment of Student Learning Barriers in Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences Conditional and Non-Conditional . راهبردهای توسعه در آموزش پزشکی . 2017; 4 (2) :60-70
URL: http://dsme.hums.ac.ir/article-1-143-en.html
MSc Hormozgan University of medical Sciences
Abstract:   (420 Views)

Introduction: One of the important specification’s human it’s learning ability and it make difference between human and animals. Learning can make critical thinking in person. Universities are principle seat of learning and undoubtedly this mission is possible by learning. The principal aim of education is student’s learning by teachers. Therefore one of the most important functions of university, to make available at the facilities for learning and fond the factors that prevent the learning. So this study designed to determine the learning obstacles of students of Hormozgan University of medical sciences.
Methods: In this case – control study, the research individuals include students of medical faculty, preclinical, and nursing and hygiene faculties. This study was done on two groups, first sample were students with at least one semester’s underachiever. The second sample were students without any dropped out. Data collecting was done by using a researcher-made questionnaire with 49 questions. The collected data was analyzed by descriptive methods and t-test and repeated measure test.
Results: 30 of underachiever students that were %36/4 female and %63/5 male and 59 of students who had not dropped out answered the questionnaire. There was significant difference between two group’s viewpoint on teaching method (Pvalue=0/038) and guidance student by supervisor professors (Pvalue=0/02).
Conclusion: The results show that the second sample were believed that the guidance student by supervisor professor and teaching method are very important for learning but the first sample viewpoint's was that educational facility and communication abilities professors are more important than other factors.

Full-Text [PDF 386 kb]   (232 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2017/02/5 | Accepted: 2017/08/19 | Published: 2017/10/14

Tables [PDF 73 KB]  (14 Download)
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author