Volume 9, Issue 2 (summer 2022)
DSME 2022, 9(2): 20-30 |
Back to browse issues page
Research code: 12686
Ethics code: IR.SSU.REC.1400.204
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Keshmiri F, Heydari A S. Meta-evaluation of the quality evaluation mechanism of teaching faculty members based on educational documentation. DSME 2022; 9 (2) :20-30
URL: http://dsme.hums.ac.ir/article-1-368-en.html
URL: http://dsme.hums.ac.ir/article-1-368-en.html
MSc, Health Technology Assessment, Education and Development Center, Shahid Sadughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Abstract: (880 Views)
Introduction: The present study aimed at Meta evaluation the mechanism of faculty members’ teaching quality evaluation based on educational documentation in Shahid Sadougi University of Medical Sciences.
Methods: This was a developmental study, carried out based on Stufflebeam's meta-evaluation approach, in four dimensions, including utility (n=7), feasibility (n=3), propriety (n=8) and accuracy (n=12).
Results: Meta-evaluation indicated that the highest total score belonged to the "accuracy" standard (45) and the lowest was that of the "feasibility". Also, the percentage of meta-evaluation power in the two standards "accuracy" (93.75%) and "utility" (85.5%) was evaluated at the highest level, and the percentage of power in the "feasibility" standard (58.3%) was at the lowest level. The percentage of meta-evaluation power in the standard of "propriety" (74.2%) was evaluated at a very good level.
Conclusion: The current results showed that faculty members’ evaluation by educational documents was recognized as a proper approach for teacher evaluation. It seems that applying this mechanism can help accurate and appropriate evaluation, besides following ethical and practical criteria for the promotion of teacher evaluation systems.
Methods: This was a developmental study, carried out based on Stufflebeam's meta-evaluation approach, in four dimensions, including utility (n=7), feasibility (n=3), propriety (n=8) and accuracy (n=12).
Results: Meta-evaluation indicated that the highest total score belonged to the "accuracy" standard (45) and the lowest was that of the "feasibility". Also, the percentage of meta-evaluation power in the two standards "accuracy" (93.75%) and "utility" (85.5%) was evaluated at the highest level, and the percentage of power in the "feasibility" standard (58.3%) was at the lowest level. The percentage of meta-evaluation power in the standard of "propriety" (74.2%) was evaluated at a very good level.
Conclusion: The current results showed that faculty members’ evaluation by educational documents was recognized as a proper approach for teacher evaluation. It seems that applying this mechanism can help accurate and appropriate evaluation, besides following ethical and practical criteria for the promotion of teacher evaluation systems.
Type of Study: Orginal |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2022/08/22 | Accepted: 2022/12/5 | Published: 2022/12/31
Received: 2022/08/22 | Accepted: 2022/12/5 | Published: 2022/12/31
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Development Strategies in Medical Education
Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb
Development Strategies in Medical Education by http://dsme.hums.ac.ir/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.